... | ... | @@ -2,34 +2,7 @@ |
|
|
|
|
|
## Attendees
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bayerlein, Bernd |
|
|
|
| Käfer, Tobias (AIFB) |
|
|
|
| ya-fan.chen |
|
|
|
| Fliegener, Sascha |
|
|
|
| Beygi Nasrabadi, Hossein |
|
|
|
| Niebel, Markus |
|
|
|
| Pirskawetz, Stephan |
|
|
|
| Falk, Florian |
|
|
|
| Danilo Dessì |
|
|
|
| Durmaz, Ali Riza |
|
|
|
| Golowin, Nadine (INT) |
|
|
|
| Birkholz, Henk |
|
|
|
| Lars Vogt (TIB) |
|
|
|
| Jörg Waitelonis (FIZ) |
|
|
|
| Anahita Samimi |
|
|
|
| Mohamed Kamal |
|
|
|
| Luis Ramos - TIB |
|
|
|
| Özgür Özcep |
|
|
|
| Muahammd Ekbal Ahmad (IDAC-TUHH) |
|
|
|
| Moritz Blum |
|
|
|
| Winkler, Juliette |
|
|
|
| Lars-Peter Meyer |
|
|
|
| Jannis Grundmann |
|
|
|
| Iwaszko, Sven |
|
|
|
| Dr. Miriam Eisenbart |
|
|
|
| Huschle, Tobias |
|
|
|
| Marc Ackermann |
|
|
|
| Sahar Ben Hassine |
|
|
|
will be copied from MS Teams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Agenda
|
... | ... | @@ -39,13 +12,38 @@ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Minutes
|
|
|
Discussion on the topic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Project presentation by DIGITRUBBER
|
|
|
## Minutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Project presentation by DIGITRUBBER (Luis Ramos)
|
|
|
Kautschuck is a natural occuring raw material with different qualities and properties. The production process must be set/adjusted to get an optimal output. The idea is to start with an extrusion step of rubber production to develop a digital twin to apply sensors of the machines to get qualitative data. Goal to define optimum parameters for optimum output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* General introduction
|
|
|
1. Why we are here:
|
|
|
- Material rubber (Kautschuck)
|
|
|
2. What do we want:
|
|
|
- reduce loss of material, increase automation, increase the quality of the products
|
|
|
3. Who are we: Deutsches Institut für Kautschuck Technologie, Leibnitz Universität hannover, TIB, and more.
|
|
|
- Luis has knowledge to work with ontologies.
|
|
|
- Lars Vogt has 15 years experience with ontologies.
|
|
|
- AI might be a rather unsecure aspect. IT devision
|
|
|
4. Where do we stand: Initial stage.
|
|
|
- Work based on user stories (what are their issues, extract their competency questions). There is nothing to just apply to existing ontologies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Competency Questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Which domain should be coveres by the ontology?
|
|
|
- manufacturing processes
|
|
|
2. What should the ontology be used for?
|
|
|
- It is not clear why the ontology is used in this process
|
|
|
3. Who will use the ontology?
|
|
|
- Domain experts, Institutions,
|
|
|
4. What questions should be answered by the ontology?
|
|
|
- Prediction of the output
|
|
|
- reduction of costs
|
|
|
- anaylsis improvement (Raman, Photometer)
|
|
|
- Quality, fluctuations, thermal and mechanical properties of the rubber can be adressed by digital data
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Discussion about the competency questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Tasks and agenda points for next meeting |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |